GW Policy:
National Research Council of the National Academies. (2011). Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services & National Institutes of Health. (2015). Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Dyson, M., Jirkof, P., Lofgren, J., Nunamaker, E., & Pang, D. (2023). Anesthesia and analgesia in laboratory animals (Third edition.). Academic Press.
Clark, J.M., Clifford, P., Jarrett, W., & Pekow, C. (2019). Communicating about animal research with the public. ILAR Journal, 1-9. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilz007
Degrazia, D. (1999). The ethics of animal research: What are the prospect for agreement? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 8(1), 23-34. doi:10.1017/S0963180199801054
Fox, J.G. & Bennett, B.T. (2015). Laboratory animal medicine: Historical perspectives. London, England: Academic Press.
Percie du Sert, et al. (2020). The ARRIVE Guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410
Moss, M. (2015). US research lab lets livestock suffer in quest for profit. New York Times.
Protection Priority. (2015, September). Nature, 525, 290. doi: 10.1038/525290a
Smith, A.J., et al. The PREPARE guidelines checklist: Planning Research and Experimental Procedures on Animals: Recommendations for Excellence (see PDF linked below)
GW Policies:
Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations. 3rd World Conference on Research Integrity, 2013.
ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice
International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans
Singapore Statement on Research Integrity
UNAIDS: Ethical Considerations in HIV Preventive Vaccine Research
UNAIDS: Good Participatory Practice. Guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials 2011
UNAIDS/WHO Guidance Document: Ethical Considerations in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials
Resnick, D.B. & Shamoo, A.E. (2011). The Singapore Statement on research integrity. Accountability in Research, 18(2), 71-75.
Case Studies for Review:
GW Policies:
Harmon, A.(2010, April 21). Indian tribe wins fight to limit research of its DNA. New York Times.
Zimmer, C. (2013, August 7). A family consents to a medical gift, 62 years later. New York Times
Wright, B., Drivas, K., Lei, Z., Merrill, S. (2014). Technology transfer: Industry-funded academic inventions boost innovation. Nature, 507, 297-299(2014). doi: 10.1038/507297a
Moore, A. (2009). More than mentoring: The importance of group culture for scientific integrity: Social management of a research group might help prevent cheating taking hold early in the career. BioEssays, 31(12), 1271-1272. doi: 10.1002/bies.200900156
GW Policy:
Case Studies for Review:
Bierer, B.E., Barnes, M. (2014). Research misconduct involving noncompliance in human subjects research supported by the public health service: Reconciling separate regulatory systems. The Hastings Center Report. S2-S26.
McKinney, R. E., & Pierce, H. H. (2017). Strategies for addressing a broader definition of conflicts of interest. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 317(17), 1727-1728. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3857
GW Policies:
Case Studies for Review:
How science goes wrong. (2013). Economist (United Kingdom), 409(8854).
National Science Foundation – Video: The basics of reproducibility.