It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
If you've been approached by a publisher as an author or editor and and are concerned it may be predatory, email Ruth Bueter, Serials Librarian (rbueter@gwu.edu).
This is decision-making tool that empowers scholars to analyze emails from publishers, editors, and other solicitors and decide whether they are reputable or predatory.
Lopez, E., & Gaspard, C.. (2018, November 14). Email Assessment Tool (Version 1). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7342769.v1
This decision-making tool empowers scholars to come to an informed conclusion as to whether a publisher or journal is reputable or predatory based on review of its website.
Lopez, E., & Gaspard, C.. (2018, November 14). Website Assessment Tool (Version 1). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7342760.v1
A dynamic list of hijacked journal titles. Hijacked journals mimic legitimate journals by adopting their titles, ISSNs, and other metadata without permission from the original journal.
