Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
- Optimum team size is approximately 4-6
- Diversity on a team increases productivity but lengthens the process
- Every team member should have clearly articulated roles
- Norms help establish and control team members’ behaviors
- Diversity among team members fortifies the team but extends the process of getting work done
- Types of diversity to consider:
3. Team Norms
- Norms are rules that have some amount of agreement and are enforced through social sanctions
- Norms define appropriate behaviors
- Norms establish mutual understanding and team identity
- Areas to consider for establishing team norms include:
- Handling disagreements
4. Team Size
- Small teams are typically more productive than large ones
- Teams that are too small have difficulty accomplishing tasks – not enough people to share the work
- Large teams enable shared responsibility and accountability
- Management problems on very large teams may outweigh the incremental resources additional people provide
- Tasks determine the size of the team
- Student projects teams of between 4-6 members are a good rule of thumb
Source: Hackman and Vidmar (1970), p. 48
- Every team member should have a role – this keeps members committed to the work of the team
- Roles need to be clearly defined
- Problems can result from role ambiguity
- Types of roles:
- Behavioral (e.g. contributor, coordinator, critic, evaluator)
- Social (e.g. encourager, expediter, group process observer, follower)
- Meeting (e.g. facilitator, recorder, time keeper)
6. Additional Reading
- Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 105-114, 116, 122.
- Hackman, J. R., & Vidmar, N. (1970). Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions. Sociometry, 33(1), 37-54.
- Hechter, M., & Opp, K. D. (2005). Social norms. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 3-5.
- Levi, D. (2011). Group dynamics for teams. Los Angeles, Calif. u.a.: SAGE, pp. 48, 64, 219-237.