Per Grant and Booth, a scoping review is defined as a "Preliminary assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature. Aims to identify the nature and extent of research evidence (usually including ongoing research)." Data is typically presented in a tabular format organized by key components such as study design and describes both the quality and quantity of literature available on the chosen topic. See: Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
(From: Brien, S., Lorenzetti, D., Lewis, S., Kennedy, J., & Ghali, W. (n.d). Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards. Implementation Science, 5)
A comparison of the characteristics of scoping and systematic reviews.
Systematic Review |
Scoping Review |
---|---|
Focused research question with narrow parameters |
Research question(s) often broad |
Inclusion/exclusion usually defined at outset |
Inclusion/exclusion can be developed post hoc |
Quality filters often applied |
Quality not an initial priority |
Detailed data extraction |
May or may not involve data extraction |
Quantitative synthesis often performed |
Synthesis more qualitative, and typically not quantitative |
Formally assesses the quality of studies and generates a conclusion relating to the focused research question |
Used to identify parameters and gaps in a body of literature |
Mallidou, A. A., Atherton, P., Chan, L., Frisch, N., Glegg, S., & Scarrow, G. (2018). Core knowledge translation competencies: A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 18 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3314-4
https://synthesismanual.jbi.global. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12